Original Article
, Volume: 13( 3)Effect of Various Concentrations of Lignin Degrading Microbes for Efficient Coir Pith Treatment
- *Correspondence:
- Priya V, Department of Civil Engineering, Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Hosur 635109, Tamil Nadu, India, Tel: 04344260570; E-mail: vaishudurga@yahoo.com
Received: April 19, 2017; Accepted: April 29, 2017; Published: May 01, 2017
Citation: Priya V, Sampath Kumar MC, Balasubramanya N. Effect of Various Concentrations of Lignin Degrading Microbes for Efficient Coir Pith Treatment. Environ Sci Ind J. 2017;13(3):136.
Abstract
Coir pith as a by-product, remains in the soil for long time and results in the ground water pollution and erode the soil completely due to the leaching during Monsoon times. This implies the importance of lignin degradation in the coir pith using microbes at various concentration to increase the productivity of enzymes in a short duration of time. Enzymes are unstable proteins which promote chemical reaction in a process. Lignin is one of the major classes of compound that are present in the coir pith. Increased lignin content in the coir pith makes its natural degradation much slower due to the lignin-cellulose complex. It is very fortunate to imply the use of microbes in the degradation process. Lignin degrading enzymes released as a result of microbial action in the coir pith. The enzymes act as catalysts which are responsible for decomposition. This study helps in the detection of major enzymes as a result of lignin degradation ending in the usage of risk free, pollution free coir pith. This study aimed at the lignin degradation for the detection of lignin degrading enzymes using the fungi such as Phanerochaete and Trichoderma viride. The inoculum concentration of the microbe added in the coir pith was compared for the efficiency and the best treatment with the concentration of microbe was recorded. At the end of the research study, the higher concentration of the microbe produced higher enzyme release in shorter duration. Clostridium treated coir pith was better performing at all the concentrations than Rock phosphate.
Keywords
Coir pith; Degradation; Enzymes; Concentration; Phanerochaete; Trichoderma viride
Introduction
Composting
Composting is the biological decomposition and stabilization of organic substrates to produce a final stable product under certain temperatures. Composting process consists of 3 major steps: pretreatment, hydrolysis, and fermentation [1]. The purpose of the pretreatment is to remove lignin and hemicelluloses content for the elimination of leaching process that leads to the soil pollution and ground water depletion. The pretreated material is followed by enzymatic hydrolysis by the use of microbes which boosts up the lignin degradation with the help of catalysts for the release of enzymes [2].
Coir pith deposition
Coir pith as an end product of Coir fiber extraction is characterized as a light, spongy material which has higher water absorbing capacity. It will be deposited on the land usually which can degrade by itself but takes an ample of time, and always remains in the soil without properly getting degraded and causes the formation of leachate and further results in the land pollution [3]. Its accumulation during rainy seasons results in the leaching and higher amount of Polyphenols release that contaminates both the surface water and ground water. In order to eliminate the consequences, biological management practices should be adopted to avoid the pollution risks [4].
Materials and Methods
Collection of coir pith
The coir pith for the treatment was procured from an industrial area TANCI, Krishnagiri.
Inoculum preparation
The microbes such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma viride were purchased from MTCC and sub-cultured for its maintenance. The microbes were inoculated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated for their growth. They were sub-cultured every 15 days. The confirmation of the microbes was analyzed by microscopical analysis [5].
Pre-treatment trials
The collected coir pith was treated with Rock phosphate and Clostridium perfringens earlier in order to accelerate the electrical conductivity reduction using organic method and biological method. For the faster degradation, the coir pith was subjected to delignification process using the fungal organisms such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trichoderma viride at various concentrations such as 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5% [6]. The organisms at the concentrated form perform well and speed up the degradation of coir pith easier and quicker. The parameters were observed after a period of 30 day [6].
Delignification enzymes detection
The specific lignin degrading enzymes for the cause of delignification were measured. The efficiency of the treated coir pith and the individual ability of each fungal organism were recorded. The enzymes, namely Cellulose, Protease, lignin peroxidases, xylanases and Laccases [5] were detected and tabulated for a period of 30 days.
Results and Discussion
Confirmation of fungal organisms
Based on the individual characteristics and the microscopic analysis confirmation, the fungal organisms were classified and identified. Trichoderma viride has well defined conidiophore structure and has repetitive branches whereas Phanerochaete, chrysosporium is thin walled and infrequently branched. It has hyphae leading to formation of conidia.
Primitive tests
The basic parameters such as pH, EC, TDS were analyzed prior the enzymes detection in order to prove that the microbes did not influence the coir pith’s physical parameters (Tables 1-27).
Treatment | pH | EC (μS) | TDS (ppm) |
---|---|---|---|
Rock Phosphate Treated | |||
Phanerochaetechrysosporium | 6.67 | 872 | 551 |
Trichodermaviride | 6.89 | 841 | 520 |
Clostridium perfringens Treated | |||
Phanerochaetechrysosporium | 6.48 | 771 | 509 |
Trichodermaviride | 6.40 | 750 | 521 |
Control | 6.52 | 991 | 695 |
Table 1: Primitive tests.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.003 | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.04 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.019 | 0.061 | 0.012 | 0.13 | |
10 | 0.095 | 0.16 | 0.065 | 0.19 | |
15 | 0.251 | 0.54 | 0.11 | 0.23 | |
20 | 0.271 | 0.76 | 0.147 | 0.31 | |
25 | 0.35 | 1.65 | 0.178 | 0.34 | |
30 | 0.391 | 2.78 | 0.189 | 0.387 | |
35 | 0.476 | 3.41 | 0.21 | 0.45 | |
40 | 0.61 | 4.21 | 0.23 | 0.51 |
Table 2: Cellulase activity in treated coir pith at 0.1%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.008 | 0.07 | 0.006 | 0.09 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.19 | 0.67 | 0.072 | 0.19 | |
10 | 0.38 | 2.09 | 0.15 | 0.27 | |
15 | 0.51 | 2.87 | 0.22 | 0.33 | |
20 | 0.59 | 3.26 | 0.256 | 0.41 | |
25 | 0.65 | 3.69 | 0.28 | 0.58 | |
30 | 0.71 | 4.41 | 0.38 | 0.67 |
Table 3: Cellulase activity in treated coir pith at 0.2%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.015 | 0.078 | 0.012 | 0.091 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.206 | 0.72 | 0.15 | 0.61 | |
10 | 0.391 | 2.11 | 0.23 | 1.38 | |
15 | 0.59 | 2.99 | 0.46 | 1.96 | |
20 | 0.781 | 3.45 | 0.59 | 2.12 | |
24 | 0.895 | 4.89 | 0.63 | 2.33 |
Table 4: Cellulase activity in treated coir pith at 0.3%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.56 | |
1 | 0.23 | 0.096 | 0.023 | 0.16 | |
5 | 0.267 | 0.81 | 0.27 | 0.69 | |
10 | 0.403 | 2.43 | 0.37 | 1.97 | |
15 | 0.769 | 3.24 | 0.67 | 2.26 | |
20 | 1.09 | 5.26 | 0.87 | 2.54 |
Table 5: Cellulase activity in treated coir pith at 0.4%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.56 | |
1 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.078 | 0.25 | |
5 | 0.41 | 1.33 | 0.55 | 1.49 | |
10 | 0.478 | 3.99 | 0.71 | 2.89 | |
14 | 1.78 | 6.22 | 1.13 | 3.09 |
Table 6: Cellulase activity in treated coir pith at 0.5%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.054 | |
1 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.008 | |
5 | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.016 | 0.012 | |
10 | 0.034 | 0.02 | 0.024 | 0.026 | |
15 | 0.042 | 0.029 | 0.036 | 0.031 | |
20 | 0.065 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 0.056 | |
25 | 0.079 | 0.046 | 0.041 | 0.076 | |
30 | 0.088 | 0.049 | 0.046 | 0.083 | |
35 | 0.099 | 0.053 | 0048 | 0.091 | |
40 | 0.109 | 0.059 | 0.053 | 0.16 |
Table 7: Laccase activity in treated coir pith at 0.1%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.054 | |
1 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.011 | |
5 | 0.028 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.017 | |
10 | 0.041 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.039 | |
15 | 0.065 | 0.032 | 0.037 | 0.087 | |
20 | 0.098 | 0.049 | 0.41 | 0.156 | |
25 | 0.17 | 0.053 | 0.049 | 0.184 | |
30 | 0.23 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.22 |
Table 8: Laccase activity in treated coir pith at 0.2%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringens treated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.054 | |
1 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.018 | |
5 | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.023 | 0.037 | |
10 | 0.178 | 0.041 | 0.038 | 0.156 | |
15 | 0.254 | 0.061 | 0.057 | 0.243 | |
20 | 0.351 | 0.069 | 0.061 | 0.36 | |
24 | 0.39 | 0.078 | 0.075 | 0.374 |
Table 9: Laccase activity in treated coir pith at 0.3%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.054 | |
1 | 0.154 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.142 | |
5 | 0.204 | 0.071 | 0.068 | 0.197 | |
10 | 0.278 | 0.079 | 0.074 | 0.254 | |
15 | 0.354 | 0.093 | 0.09 | 0.368 | |
20 | 0.476 | 0.12 | 0.113 | 0.451 |
Table 10: Laccase activity in treated coir pith at 0.4%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 0.054 | |
1 | 0.189 | 0.073 | 0.069 | 0.171 | |
5 | 0.27 | 0.088 | 0.082 | 0.251 | |
10 | 0.39 | 0.152 | 0.123 | 0.387 | |
14 | 0.506 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.497 |
Table 11: Laccase activity in treated coir pith at 0.5%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 2.6 | |
1 | 1.22 | 11.34 | 0.34 | -0.002 | |
5 | 1.67 | 12.72 | 1.65 | -0.007 | |
10 | 2.89 | 14.29 | 2.09 | -0.011 | |
15 | 3.11 | 14.76 | 3.18 | -0.021 | |
20 | 4.21 | 15.33 | 4.25 | -0.022 | |
25 | 4.86 | 18.34 | 4.77 | -0.027 | |
30 | 5.17 | 22.7 | 5.19 | -0.033 | |
35 | 6.36 | 25.11 | 6.88 | -0.039 | |
40 | 7.1 | 27.5 | 7.41 | -0.088 |
Table 12: Lignin peroxidase activity in treated coir pith at 0.1%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 2.6 | |
1 | 1.45 | 16.7 | 0.98 | -0.005 | |
5 | 3.06 | 24.98 | 3.78 | -0.015 | |
10 | 5.32 | 26.87 | 5.12 | -0.019 | |
15 | 6.94 | 27.12 | 5.96 | -0.023 | |
20 | 7.87 | 29.82 | 7.04 | -0.022 | |
25 | 8.39 | 31.45 | 8.76 | -0.026 | |
30 | 8.8 | 33.4 | 9.2 | 0.002 |
Table 13: Lignin peroxidase activity in treated coir pith at 0.2%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | 2.6 | |
1 | 1.61 | 18.11 | 1.44 | -0.009 | |
5 | 3.65 | 25.07 | 4.02 | -0.028 | |
10 | 5.89 | 28.98 | 5.67 | -0.099 | |
15 | 7.11 | 30.61 | 6.39 | 0.012 | |
20 | 9.33 | 33.65 | 8.88 | 0.045 | |
24 | 10.103 | 37.23 | 9.77 | 0.076 |
Table 14: Lignin peroxidase activity in treated coir pith at 0.3%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.99 | 19.33 | 2.01 | -0.012 | 2.6 |
5 | 3.78 | 26.09 | 4.77 | 0.024 | |
10 | 6.71 | 31.65 | 6.99 | 0.131 | |
15 | 8.65 | 34.89 | 7.09 | 0.198 | |
20 | 12.93 | 39.41 | 10.21 | 0.209 |
Table 15: Lignin peroxidase activity in treated coir pith at 0.4%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringens treated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.054 |
5 | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.023 | 0.037 | |
10 | 0.178 | 0.041 | 0.038 | 0.156 | |
15 | 0.254 | 0.061 | 0.057 | 0.243 | |
20 | 0.351 | 0.069 | 0.061 | 0.36 | |
24 | 0.39 | 0.078 | 0.075 | 0.374 |
Table 16: Lignin peroxidase activity in treated coir pith at 0.5%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.76 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.54 | 0.56 |
5 | 1.13 | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.97 | |
10 | 1.78 | 2.87 | 3.1 | 3.66 | |
15 | 2.11 | 3.41 | 3.75 | 3.98 | |
20 | 2.65 | 3.76 | 4.11 | 4.14 | |
25 | 3.07 | 4.12 | 4.53 | 4.51 | |
30 | 3.42 | 4.51 | 4.87 | 4.77 | |
35 | 3.78 | 4.89 | 5.08 | 5.02 | |
40 | 4.34 | 5.44 | 5.27 | 5.48 |
Table 17: Protease activity in treated coir pith at 0.1%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.04 | 1.63 | 1.36 | 2.31 | 0.56 |
5 | 3.22 | 3.05 | 3.03 | 4.02 | |
10 | 3.76 | 3.65 | 3.98 | 4.49 | |
15 | 4.09 | 4.17 | 4.56 | 5.27 | |
20 | 4.73 | 5.89 | 5.2 | 5.34 | |
25 | 4.95 | 6.12 | 5.78 | 5.94 | |
30 | 5.1 | 6.3 | 6 | 6.35 |
Table 18: Protease activity in treated coir pith at 0.2%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.16 | 2.02 | 1.45 | 2.76 | 0.56 |
5 | 2.49 | 2.9 | 3.11 | 3.67 | |
10 | 3.92 | 3.37 | 3.96 | 4.85 | |
15 | 4.35 | 4.02 | 4.19 | 5.23 | |
20 | 4.90 | 5.43 | 5.08 | 5.79 | |
24 | 5.33 | 6.66 | 6.22 | 6.71 |
Table 19: Protease activity in treated coir pith at 0.3%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.31 | 2.33 | 1.88 | 2.77 | 0.56 |
5 | 2.53 | 2.81 | 2.94 | 3.81 | |
10 | 4.02 | 4.92 | 4.03 | 4.76 | |
15 | 4.78 | 6.22 | 5.55 | 6.05 | |
20 | 5.87 | 7.03 | 6.93 | 7.12 |
Table 20: Protease activity in treated coir pith at 0.4%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.56 | 2.45 | 2.03 | 3.01 | 0.56 |
5 | 3.71 | 3.71 | 4.12 | 4.18 | |
10 | 5.01 | 6.03 | 6.09 | 6.12 | |
14 | 6.03 | 7.55 | 7.21 | 7.42 |
Table 21: Protease activity in treated coir pith at 0.5%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.043 | 1.06 | 0.47 | 2.76 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.126 | 1.79 | 1.65 | 3.01 | |
10 | 0.398 | 2.32 | 2.03 | 3.43 | |
15 | 0.92 | 2.8 | 2.65 | 3.91 | |
20 | 1.2 | 3.09 | 2.89 | 4.12 | |
25 | 1.51 | 3.54 | 3.22 | 4.87 | |
30 | 1.62 | 3.98 | 3.74 | 5.33 | |
35 | 1.76 | 4.43 | 4.03 | 6.01 | |
40 | 1.84 | 4.76 | 4.29 | 6.83 |
Table 22: Xylanase activity in treated coir pith at 0.1%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.086 | 1.32 | 0.89 | 3.22 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.553 | 2.21 | 1.16 | 4.95 | |
10 | 1.34 | 2.71 | 1.92 | 5.24 | |
15 | 1.7 | 3.86 | 2.45 | 6.54 | |
20 | 1.89 | 4.09 | 3.28 | 6.78 | |
25 | 1.99 | 5.02 | 3.95 | 7.11 | |
30 | 2.12 | 5.32 | 4.61 | 7.21 |
Table 23: Xylanase activity in treated coir pith at 0.2%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.276 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 3.89 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.561 | 3.49 | 3.14 | 4.21 | |
10 | 0.791 | 4.1 | 3.87 | 6.19 | |
15 | 1.32 | 4.56 | 4.07 | 6.81 | |
20 | 1.87 | 5.31 | 4.4 | 7.21 | |
24 | 2.43 | 5.89 | 4.98 | 7.78 |
Table 24: Xylanase activity in treated coir pith at 0.3%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 0.769 | 2.75 | 2.65 | 5.31 | 0.56 |
5 | 1.31 | 4.97 | 4.23 | 7.22 | |
10 | 1.56 | 5.59 | 4.76 | 7.77 | |
15 | 2.05 | 6.01 | 5.13 | 8.21 | |
20 | 2.9 | 6.17 | 5.78 | 8.45 |
Table 25: Xylanase activity in treated coir pith at 0.4%.
Day | Activity (mg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1 (Rock Phosphate Treated) | Trial 2 (Clostridium perfringensTreated) | Control | |||
Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | Phanerochaete | Trichodermaviride | ||
1 | 1.63 | 2.75 | 2.65 | 5.31 | 0.56 |
5 | 2.05 | 5.59 | 4.76 | 7.77 | |
10 | 2.88 | 5.13 | 8.21 | ||
14 | 3.26 | 6.89 | 6.15 | 8.9 |
Table 26: Xylanase activity in treated coir pith at 0.5%.
Treatment | Total Lignin (mg/g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rock Phosphate TreatedInitial | 0.1% - 41st day | 0.2% - 31st day | 0.3% - 25th day | 0.4% - 21st day | 0.5% - 15th day | |
Phanerochaetechrysosporium | 1506.3 | 146.3 | 100.3 | 95.1 | 91.2 | 81.2 |
Trichodermaviride | 144.3 | 99.6 | 90.2 | 88.4 | 85.6 | |
Clostridium perfringensTreated | ||||||
Phanerochaetechrysosporium | 1506.3 | 130.2 | 81.3 | 75.1 | 68.2 | 50.1 |
Trichodermaviride | 137.9 | 85.1 | 79.6 | 72.1 | 53.2 |
Table 27: Lignin content in treated and untreated coir pith.
It was examined that the lignin degrading fungal organisms did not pose any serious threat to the physical characteristics of coir pith. Increase in EC or TDS coir pith leads to altering of chelating properties, polyphenol exudation, pH alteration that results in the chemical composition imbalance in coir pith.
Enzymatic Analysis
Cellulase activity
The fungus R. stolonifer and P. chrysosporium produced near to the value of coculture at 28 days of fermentation [7]. Also, the coculture showed maximum cellulase enzyme activities on the 28 days of incubation while the activities of R. stolonifer and P. chrysosporium cellulase enzymes were observed maximally on the same day of fermentation. They also reported that the higher amount of cellulase and xylanase enzyme production by Aspergillus terreus during the course of solid state fermentation.
In this research study, cellulase enzyme was detected at the regular interval of time for a period of 40 days at various concentrations such as 0.1% to 0.5% to know the efficiency of the microbe degrading the coir pith when inoculated with Phanerochaete and Trichoderma viride. It was concluded that the cellulase enzyme measured was higher in T. viride than Phanerochaete in the Rock phosphate treated coir compared to Clostridium perfringens treated. As the microbe concentration increased, the cellulose enzyme release also increased showing the capability of microbe acting with coir pith effectively.
Laccase activity
Initiation of depolymerization of lignin is usually posed by the multinuclear enzyme called Laccases. In the study conducted by [7], the laccase activity increased gradually during fermentation and the maximum activity (5.1 IU/ml) was found to be in 28th days of fermentation carried out by co culture. Here, the laccases were maximum degraded by T. viride in Clostridium perfringens treated coir pith at 0.5% and showed higher rate of laccase enzyme release than the Rock phosphate treated coir that increased gradually from 0.1%. Phanerochaete chrysoporium, showed better performance with Rock phosphate as treatment than Clostridium perfringens treated coir pith.
Lignin peroxidase activity
Lignin peroxidase is an extracellular enzyme which plays a key role in breaking of lignin molecules by the process of lignin degradation. During the research study conducted by Kanmani et al. [7], almost all the selected fungi could produce significant level of lignin peroxidase (LiP) during the fermentation period which was comparatively higher than laccase activity.
Maximum amount of Lip activity (8.1 IU/ml) was observed on the 28th day of fermentation by using co culture method. But R. stolonifer produced very low level of activity (3.5 IU/ml) on the same fermentation period. In this study, the LiP activity was produced in higher amount than the other lignin degrading enzymes.
The best LiP activity was in the Rock phosphate treated coir pith with 0.5% T. viride which almost shown complete degradation of coir pith by the release of enzyme whereas in the Clostridium treated coir pith, slower degradation activity was observed gradually from 0.1% to 0.5%.
Protease activity
Several hypotheses in the role of proteases in wood rotting fungi. They indicated their possible implication in the release of lignolytic enzymes from the fungal cell wall [6]. One of the functions of the proteases produced by white rot fungi is to recycle nitrogen by break down of proteins released into the medium for cell autolysis [4]. Proteases enzyme at the end of lignin degradation are responsible for breaking down of peptide bonds during hydrolysis process. The efficiency of protease individually at all the concentrations was very well proven in all the treatments. Highest protease activity was measured in both the fungal degrading organisms which helped in lignin degradation in 14 days at 0.5% concentration and 40 days at 0.1%.
Xylanase activity
The coir waste was used as lignocellulose materials for bioconversion. During the bioconversion, hemicellulose was effectively degraded by producing the enzyme xylanase [7]. The increased amount of xylanase (16.4 IU/ml) was recorded after 28 days of incubation period. Xylanases are involved in the breakdown of lignin cell wall for the release of the enzymes. In this study, highest activity was recorded in Clostridium treated coir pith showed quick degradation using T. viride in 14 days at 0.5% concentration when compared to Phanerochaete and rock phosphate treated coir pith. Overall, the activity was gradually increased from 0.1% to 0.5%.
Estimation of lignin in the degraded coir pith
By the action of Pleurotus sajor Caju the amount of lignin could be reduced from 32% to 20% [2]. It is also seen that the action of Pleurotus sajor Caju on the washed sample of coir pith is more than that on the unwashed sample. This can be explained by the fact that washing exposes the cell walls thus increasing the surface area for decomposition. In this study, the lignin content was degraded using the lignin degrading microbes at various concentrations and recorded that the higher concentration of the lignin degrading microbes such as Phanerochaete and Trichoderma viride helped in the faster reduction of lignin content in the collected coir pith. On higher concentration, the microbe tends to act faster in the coir by using up all the lignin and produces enzymes.
Conclusion
It is evident that the coir pith can be converted to effective manure for agriculture in a shorter period of time when higher concentration of microbial inoculum was used. The action of microbe in the treated coir pith was very active at all the concentrations that showed a remarkable reduction in the lignin content of coir pith after treatment with lignin degrading microbes. This is an alternative method for solving the serious problem of coir pith from causing pollution.
References
- Keay L, Wildi BS. Proteases of the genusBacillus. I. Neutralproteases. BiotechnolBioeng. 1970;12(2):179-212.
- ReghuvaranA, RavindranathAD. Biochemical aspects and formation of phenolic compounds by coir pith degraded by Pleurotussajorcaju. JToxicolEnv Heal Sci. 2012;4(1):29-36.
- TAPPI T 222 OM-02.Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp, In: 2002-2003 TAPPI Test Methods.Atlanta:Tappi Press, USA; 2002.
- Dosoretz CG,Dass SB, Reddy CA, et al. Protease mediated degradation of lignin peroxidase in liquid cultures of phanerochaetechrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbial. 1990;56(2):3429-34.
- NidadavoluH, Ram PMSVSSSL, MaringantiSC, et al. Bioactive compounds from discarded mushroom beds.Turk J Biol. 2012;36(3):275-82.
- Eriksson KE, Petterson B. Purification and partial characterization of two acidic proteases from the white rot fungus Sporotrichumpulverulentum. Eur JBiochem.1982;124(3):635-42.
- KanmaniP, Karuppasamy P, Pothiraj C, et al. Studies on lignocellulose biodegradation of coir waste in solid state fermentation using Phanerocheatechrysosporium and Rhizopusstolonifer. Afr JBiotechnol.2009;8(24):6880-7.